Ajay Nagnath Kshirsagar vs Bhagubai Tatya Waghmode — 252/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190021592023

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

21st July 2026

e-Filing Number

19-08-2023

Filing Number

639/2023

Filing Date

21-08-2023

Registration No

252/2023

Registration Date

30-08-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Ajay Nagnath Kshirsagar

Adv. JANRAO SONAL VITTHAL

Respondent(s)

Bhagubai Tatya Waghmode

Nanasaheb Tatya Waghmode

Rajabhau Tatya Waghmode

Sitabai Sukhadev Lengare

Nivrutti Vishvanath Sarwade

Anil Bhiva Shingade

Jayram Bhiva Shingade

Shivaji Sadashiv Waghmode

Sujata Rajabhau Waghmode

Atul Govardhan Bhosale

Satish Govardhan Bhosale

Surekha Govardhan Bhosale

Bibhishan Krushnat Bhosale

Uttam Krushnath Bhosale

Samadhan Krushnath Bhosale

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

30-04-2026

Steps_Unready

13-03-2026

Steps_Unready

30-01-2026

Steps_Unready

15-12-2025

Steps_Unready

07-11-2025

Steps_Unready

Interim Orders

15-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

In R.C.S. No. 252/2023, the court allowed Defendant No. 5's application to submit his written statement with delay condonation, conditioned on payment of Rs. 500 cost to the plaintiff before the next date. The suit concerns agricultural property declaration, possession, and perpetual injunction at village Pokharapur, and the court permitted Defendant No. 5 to proceed on merit while compensating the plaintiff for the four-month filing delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In R.C.S. No. 252/2023, the court allowed Defendant No. 5's application to submit his written statement with delay condonation, conditioned on payment of Rs. 500 cost to the plaintiff before the next date. The suit concerns agricultural property declaration, possession, and perpetual injunction at village Pokharapur, and the court permitted Defendant No. 5 to proceed on merit while compensating the plaintiff for the four-month filing delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case