Ajay Nagnath Kshirsagar vs Bhagubai Tatya Waghmode — 252/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO190021592023
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
19-08-2023
Filing Number
639/2023
Filing Date
21-08-2023
Registration No
252/2023
Registration Date
30-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay Nagnath Kshirsagar
Adv. JANRAO SONAL VITTHAL
Respondent(s)
Bhagubai Tatya Waghmode
Nanasaheb Tatya Waghmode
Rajabhau Tatya Waghmode
Sitabai Sukhadev Lengare
Nivrutti Vishvanath Sarwade
Anil Bhiva Shingade
Jayram Bhiva Shingade
Shivaji Sadashiv Waghmode
Sujata Rajabhau Waghmode
Atul Govardhan Bhosale
Satish Govardhan Bhosale
Surekha Govardhan Bhosale
Bibhishan Krushnat Bhosale
Uttam Krushnath Bhosale
Samadhan Krushnath Bhosale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 30-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 15-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 07-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
In R.C.S. No. 252/2023, the court allowed Defendant No. 5's application to submit his written statement with delay condonation, conditioned on payment of Rs. 500 cost to the plaintiff before the next date. The suit concerns agricultural property declaration, possession, and perpetual injunction at village Pokharapur, and the court permitted Defendant No. 5 to proceed on merit while compensating the plaintiff for the four-month filing delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In R.C.S. No. 252/2023, the court allowed Defendant No. 5's application to submit his written statement with delay condonation, conditioned on payment of Rs. 500 cost to the plaintiff before the next date. The suit concerns agricultural property declaration, possession, and perpetual injunction at village Pokharapur, and the court permitted Defendant No. 5 to proceed on merit while compensating the plaintiff for the four-month filing delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts