Adinath Vithoba Gavade vs Shamal Haridas Gavade Advocate - Kumbhar P.S. — 296/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Additional W.S.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO190020852022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
539/2022
Filing Date
12-10-2022
Registration No
296/2022
Registration Date
12-10-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Adinath Vithoba Gavade
Adv. Choudhari Krishnat Bhairavnath
Respondent(s)
Shamal Haridas Gavade Advocate - Kumbhar P.S.
Anil Gorakhnath Ghodake
Sunil Gorakhnath Ghodake(Legal Heir)
Laxmibai Gorakhnath Ghodake
Digambar Machindra Vasekar
Bhimrao Dhondiba Namade
Tau Dhondiba Namade
Savata Apparao Namade
Sadhu Apparao Namade
Jalindar Vithoba Gavade
Changdev Vithoba Gavade
Gopinath Vithoba Gavade
Dadarao Kanifnath Gavade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol
Additional W.S.
Additional W.S.
Additional W.S.
Additional W.S.
Additional W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Additional W.S. |
| 29-01-2026 | Additional W.S. |
| 08-12-2025 | Additional W.S. |
| 18-10-2025 | Additional W.S. |
| 16-09-2025 | Additional W.S. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 296/2022 - Adinath Vithoba Gavade v. Shamal Haridas Gavade Order Granted (08.07.2025): The court granted the petitioner's petition to permit necessary rectification of property records concerning a disputed road. The petitioner claimed respondents were blocking access to a public road (2-2.5 km stretch near Tarapur) on the property, claiming private ownership. The court found the core issue requires full evidence hearing and allowed the petitioner to make the requested rectification as justice demands, ordering the petitioner to file required documents within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 296/2022 - Adinath Vithoba Gavade v. Shamal Haridas Gavade Order Granted (08.07.2025): The court granted the petitioner's petition to permit necessary rectification of property records concerning a disputed road. The petitioner claimed respondents were blocking access to a public road (2-2.5 km stretch near Tarapur) on the property, claiming private ownership. The court found the core issue requires full evidence hearing and allowed the petitioner to make the requested rectification as justice demands, ordering the petitioner to file required documents within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts