Dhanaji Dadarao Garad vs Netaji Dadarao Garad Advocate - Kulkarni Jayantkumar Bhimrao — 311/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,,39. Status: Report. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Report Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190019042024

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

646/2024

Filing Date

22-Oct-2024

Registration No

311/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

3-II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,,39

Petitioner(s)

1.Dhanaji Dadarao Garad

Adv. CHAUDHARI PRAKASH HARIBA

Respondent(s)

1.Netaji Dadarao Garad Advocate - Kulkarni Jayantkumar Bhimrao
2.Tanaji Dadarao Garad

Case History

10-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
30-Mar-2026

Report

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
13-Mar-2026

Report

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
17-Feb-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
07-Feb-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
06-Jan-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
02-Dec-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
27-Nov-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

In RCS 311/2024, the defendant sought to amend his written statement to include legal principles regarding rejection of temporary injunction relief. The court rejected the application, holding that under Order VI Rule 2 of the CPC 1908, pleadings must pertain to material facts only, not law or evidence, and therefore the proposed amendment was unnecessary. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
27-Nov-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
29-Oct-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
06-Oct-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
22-Sep-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
03-Sep-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
20-Aug-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
30-Jul-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
14-Jul-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
20-Jun-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Jun-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
19-Jun-2025

Order on Exh

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
12-Jun-2025

Arguments

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
21-Apr-2025

Arguments
05-Apr-2025

Arguments

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
17-Mar-2025

Arguments

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
27-Feb-2025

Issues

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
11-Feb-2025

Issues

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
30-Jan-2025

Issues

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
10-Jan-2025

Issues

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
19-Dec-2024

W.S. and Say

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
26-Nov-2024

W.S. and Say

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
04-Nov-2024

Notice_Unready

II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
24-Oct-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
22-Oct-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 311/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In RCS 311/2024, the defendant sought to amend his written statement to include legal principles regarding rejection of temporary injunction relief. The court rejected the application, holding that under Order VI Rule 2 of the CPC 1908, pleadings must pertain to material facts only, not law or evidence, and therefore the proposed amendment was unnecessary. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.