State of Maharashtra vs Mohosin Shaikh — 271/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO190018902018
Filing Number
1600/2018
Filing Date
07-12-2018
Registration No
271/2018
Registration Date
07-12-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
144
Police Station
Kamti Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Mohosin Shaikh
Alluddin Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mohosin Shaikh and Alluddin Shaikh (271/2018) The court acquitted both defendants of theft charges under IPC Section 379 with Section 34 and Environment Protection Act Sections 9 and 15. The prosecution failed to establish essential elements of theft beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony regarding a tempo vehicle containing brass material. The judgment found critical deficiencies in evidence collection, including lack of proper measurement instruments, photographic documentation, and material authority certifications, which undermined the prosecution's case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mohosin Shaikh and Alluddin Shaikh (271/2018) The court acquitted both defendants of theft charges under IPC Section 379 with Section 34 and Environment Protection Act Sections 9 and 15. The prosecution failed to establish essential elements of theft beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony regarding a tempo vehicle containing brass material. The judgment found critical deficiencies in evidence collection, including lack of proper measurement instruments, photographic documentation, and material authority certifications, which undermined the prosecution's case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts