State of Maharashtra vs Samadhan Ramchandra Waghmode Advocate - Shinde Hemantukumar Bajarang — 282/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO190017882023
Filing Number
1196/2023
Filing Date
02-08-2023
Registration No
282/2023
Registration Date
02-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
840
Police Station
Mohol Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Samadhan Ramchandra Waghmode Advocate - Shinde Hemantukumar Bajarang
Jyoti Bapu Waghmode
Bhiwarabai Ramchandra Waghmode
Bapusaheb Ramchandra Waghmode
Ramchandra Narayan Waghmode
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 282/2023 - Summary The court acquitted all five accused (Samadhan Ramchandra Waghmode and four family members) of charges under IPC Sections 498(A), 504, and 506 with Section 34. The prosecution failed to establish the dowry harassment and cruelty charges through credible evidence, as the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration from other witnesses, and contradictions emerged during cross-examination regarding the timeline and nature of alleged mistreatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 282/2023 - Summary The court acquitted all five accused (Samadhan Ramchandra Waghmode and four family members) of charges under IPC Sections 498(A), 504, and 506 with Section 34. The prosecution failed to establish the dowry harassment and cruelty charges through credible evidence, as the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration from other witnesses, and contradictions emerged during cross-examination regarding the timeline and nature of alleged mistreatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts