Kailas Bapu Shelake vs Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate - Shendage Sandip Ramdas — 264/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190017612025

Issues

Next Hearing

24th July 2026

e-Filing Number

20-09-2025

Filing Number

446/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

264/2025

Registration Date

23-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Kailas Bapu Shelake

Adv. LALE SHREERANG DATTATRAYA

Krushnabai Kailas Shelake

Adv. LALE SHREERANG DATTATRAYA

Respondent(s)

Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate - Shendage Sandip Ramdas

Sandip Bharat Jarag

Adv. Shendage Sandip Ramdas

Subhash Janardhan Jarag

Adv. Shendage Sandip Ramdas

Dipak Subhash Jarag

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol

06-05-2026

Issues

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

01-04-2026

Order on Exh

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

06-05-2026
Order on T.I.

Case 264/2025 Summary Petitioner(s): Kailas Bapu Shelake and Krushnabai Kailas Shelake Respondent(s): Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate and others Order Outcome (Passed 06/05/2026): The interim injunction petition was partially allowed. The court directed respondents 1-4 to refrain from cutting down any tamarind tree that regrows in disputed Property Gat No. 151, and from obstructing petitioners' water usage rights or road access to the shared well on that property. The court found petitioners established prima facie rights to 1/16 share in the well and tree based on their registered deed of 23/08/2001. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 264/2025 Summary Petitioner(s): Kailas Bapu Shelake and Krushnabai Kailas Shelake Respondent(s): Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate and others Order Outcome (Passed 06/05/2026): The interim injunction petition was partially allowed. The court directed respondents 1-4 to refrain from cutting down any tamarind tree that regrows in disputed Property Gat No. 151, and from obstructing petitioners' water usage rights or road access to the shared well on that property. The court found petitioners established prima facie rights to 1/16 share in the well and tree based on their registered deed of 23/08/2001. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case