Kailas Bapu Shelake vs Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate - Shendage Sandip Ramdas — 264/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO190017612025
Next Hearing
24th July 2026
e-Filing Number
20-09-2025
Filing Number
446/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
264/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kailas Bapu Shelake
Adv. LALE SHREERANG DATTATRAYA
Krushnabai Kailas Shelake
Adv. LALE SHREERANG DATTATRAYA
Respondent(s)
Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate - Shendage Sandip Ramdas
Sandip Bharat Jarag
Adv. Shendage Sandip Ramdas
Subhash Janardhan Jarag
Adv. Shendage Sandip Ramdas
Dipak Subhash Jarag
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Issues |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 264/2025 Summary Petitioner(s): Kailas Bapu Shelake and Krushnabai Kailas Shelake Respondent(s): Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate and others Order Outcome (Passed 06/05/2026): The interim injunction petition was partially allowed. The court directed respondents 1-4 to refrain from cutting down any tamarind tree that regrows in disputed Property Gat No. 151, and from obstructing petitioners' water usage rights or road access to the shared well on that property. The court found petitioners established prima facie rights to 1/16 share in the well and tree based on their registered deed of 23/08/2001. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 264/2025 Summary Petitioner(s): Kailas Bapu Shelake and Krushnabai Kailas Shelake Respondent(s): Bharat Vithoba Jarag Advocate and others Order Outcome (Passed 06/05/2026): The interim injunction petition was partially allowed. The court directed respondents 1-4 to refrain from cutting down any tamarind tree that regrows in disputed Property Gat No. 151, and from obstructing petitioners' water usage rights or road access to the shared well on that property. The court found petitioners established prima facie rights to 1/16 share in the well and tree based on their registered deed of 23/08/2001. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts