Bajirao Siddhu Dudhal vs Shrikant Ramchandra Dhudal Advocate - Kumbhar P.S. — 183/2022
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO190014572022
Filing Number
340/2022
Filing Date
27-Jul-2022
Registration No
183/2022
Registration Date
27-Jul-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
3-II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bajirao Siddhu Dudhal
Adv. Shinde Hemantukumar Bajarang
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shrikant Ramchandra Dhudal Advocate - Kumbhar P.S.
-
2.Jakraya Ramchandra Dudhal
Adv. Sirsat T.B.
-
3.Delip Krushnat Devkate
Adv. Kumbhar P.S.
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
12-Nov-2025
Hearing
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
11-Jun-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
10-Apr-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
30-Oct-2023
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
21-Sep-2023
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
31-Aug-2023
Evidence
II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol
-
26-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
22-Jun-2023
List of Witness
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
15-Apr-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
10-Mar-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 183/2022 Summary: In this land recovery suit over agricultural property, the court allowed Defendants 1 and 2's application to submit their written statement despite missing the filing deadline. The court permitted the defendants to file their written statement subject to payment of previously imposed costs (Rs. 400), to ensure the matter could be decided on merit rather than procedural grounds. Cost was awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
17-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
24-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
13-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
01-Nov-2022
Steps
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
29-Sep-2022
Filing Of V.P.
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
-
01-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 183/2022
Case 183/2022 Summary: In this land recovery suit over agricultural property, the court allowed Defendants 1 and 2's application to submit their written statement despite missing the filing deadline. The court permitted the defendants to file their written statement subject to payment of previously imposed costs (Rs. 400), to ensure the matter could be decided on merit rather than procedural grounds. Cost was awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts