State of Maharashtra vs Shivaji Balu Pujari — 368/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO190009782024

Case disposed

Filing Number

591/2024

Filing Date

10-05-2024

Registration No

368/2024

Registration Date

10-05-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

1051

Police Station

Mohol Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Shivaji Balu Pujari

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. JMFC Mohol

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

30-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

26-03-2025

Awaiting Summons

11-10-2024

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shivaji Balu Pujari (S.T.C. 368/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged liquor prohibition violations under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that despite repeated summons since the charge sheet filing on 10.05.2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and the police produced no report on summons execution. The absence of a Chemical Analyzer report further rendered the prosecution's case untenable. The seized liquor was confiscated to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shivaji Balu Pujari (S.T.C. 368/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged liquor prohibition violations under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that despite repeated summons since the charge sheet filing on 10.05.2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and the police produced no report on summons execution. The absence of a Chemical Analyzer report further rendered the prosecution's case untenable. The seized liquor was confiscated to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case