Ashwini Subhash Patil vs Mahaveer Dagadu Randive Advocate - Sirsat T.B. — 131/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190007262021

Filing Number

160/2021

Filing Date

05-Mar-2021

Registration No

131/2021

Registration Date

05-Mar-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

3-II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashwini Subhash Patil

    Adv. Shinde Hemantukumar Bajarang

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahaveer Dagadu Randive Advocate - Sirsat T.B.

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  7. 28-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  10. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  12. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  13. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  16. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  17. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  18. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  19. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  20. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  21. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  22. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  23. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  24. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  25. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  26. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  27. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  28. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  29. 23-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  30. 11-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  32. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

  33. 20-Apr-2023

    Issues

  34. 05-Apr-2023

    Issues

  35. 18-Mar-2023

    Issues

  36. 10-Feb-2023

    Issues

  37. 16-Jan-2023

    Issues

  38. 22-Dec-2022

    Issues

  39. 17-Nov-2022

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Reg. Civ. Suit No. 131/2021 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 17.11.2022. Key Facts: Plaintiff Ashwini Subhash Patil sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendant Mahaveer Dagadu Randive from obstructing cultivation of agricultural land in Degaon, Solapur. The plaintiff claimed to have purchased the property via two sale deeds (2017, 2018) worth Rs. 6.5 lakhs. The defendant contended these were money-lending transactions where the property served as security for loans at 5% monthly interest, with agreed re-transfer upon repayment. Court's Finding: The court found no prima facie case in plaintiff's favor. A spot inspection by the District Deputy Registrar confirmed the defendant remained in possession of the property with his residence on it. The court determined the transaction was a money-lending arrangement rather than an outright sale, and that the plaintiff failed to establish actual possession necessary for an injunction restraining obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  40. 17-Nov-2022

    Issues

  41. 02-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  42. 14-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  43. 01-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  44. 20-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  45. 15-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  46. 03-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  47. 29-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  48. 25-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  49. 19-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  50. 16-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  51. 03-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  52. 15-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  53. 10-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  54. 25-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  55. 11-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  56. 16-Mar-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  57. 16-Mar-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  58. 03-Mar-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  59. 17-Feb-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  60. 25-Jan-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  61. 04-Jan-2022

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  62. 26-Nov-2021

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  63. 08-Nov-2021

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  64. 18-Sep-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  65. 25-Aug-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  66. 08-Jul-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  67. 30-Jun-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  68. 16-Jun-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  69. 22-Apr-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  70. 03-Apr-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  71. 09-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 05-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Reg. Civ. Suit No. 131/2021 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 17.11.2022. Key Facts: Plaintiff Ashwini Subhash Patil sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendant Mahaveer Dagadu Randive from obstructing cultivation of agricultural land in Degaon, Solapur. The plaintiff claimed to have purchased the property via two sale deeds (2017, 2018) worth Rs. 6.5 lakhs. The defendant contended these were money-lending transactions where the property served as security for loans at 5% monthly interest, with agreed re-transfer upon repayment. Court's Finding: The court found no prima facie case in plaintiff's favor. A spot inspection by the District Deputy Registrar confirmed the defendant remained in possession of the property with his residence on it. The court determined the transaction was a money-lending arrangement rather than an outright sale, and that the plaintiff failed to establish actual possession necessary for an injunction restraining obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case