Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale vs Mina Hanmant Bhosale Advocate - Ivare Suchita R. — 92/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 02-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190005712024

e-Filing Number

09-03-2024

Filing Number

179/2024

Filing Date

15-Mar-2024

Registration No

92/2024

Registration Date

16-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale

    Adv. DESHPANDE SUDHIR KHANDERAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mina Hanmant Bhosale Advocate - Ivare Suchita R.

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 92/2024 Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale v. Mina Hanmant Bhosale The respondent's petition to condone a 14-month 14-day delay in filing an affidavit (kaifiyat) in this property dispute case was partially granted. The court imposed costs of ₹1,000 on the petitioner and condoned the delay, permitting the respondent to file the affidavit after payment. The court found the delay partly justified due to property-related documentation collection requirements, while noting the petitioner's argument that the delay appeared deliberate lacked sufficient substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Compliance

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  9. 22-Sep-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  11. 19-Jun-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  12. 22-Apr-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  13. 18-Mar-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  15. 10-Feb-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  16. 08-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  17. 20-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  18. 15-Nov-2024

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  19. 10-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  20. 05-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  21. 02-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  22. 12-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  23. 26-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  24. 10-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  25. 19-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  26. 03-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  27. 28-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  28. 21-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 15-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 92/2024 Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale v. Mina Hanmant Bhosale The respondent's petition to condone a 14-month 14-day delay in filing an affidavit (kaifiyat) in this property dispute case was partially granted. The court imposed costs of ₹1,000 on the petitioner and condoned the delay, permitting the respondent to file the affidavit after payment. The court found the delay partly justified due to property-related documentation collection requirements, while noting the petitioner's argument that the delay appeared deliberate lacked sufficient substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case