Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale vs Mina Hanmant Bhosale Advocate - Ivare Suchita R. — 92/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190005712024

Issues

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2024

Filing Number

179/2024

Filing Date

15-03-2024

Registration No

92/2024

Registration Date

16-03-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale

Adv. DESHPANDE SUDHIR KHANDERAO

Respondent(s)

Mina Hanmant Bhosale Advocate - Ivare Suchita R.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

13-04-2026

Issues

13-03-2026

Issues

13-02-2026

Compliance

06-01-2026

Order on Exh

26-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

18-03-2025
Order on T.I.
13-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 92/2024 Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale v. Mina Hanmant Bhosale The respondent's petition to condone a 14-month 14-day delay in filing an affidavit (kaifiyat) in this property dispute case was partially granted. The court imposed costs of ₹1,000 on the petitioner and condoned the delay, permitting the respondent to file the affidavit after payment. The court found the delay partly justified due to property-related documentation collection requirements, while noting the petitioner's argument that the delay appeared deliberate lacked sufficient substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 92/2024 Hanmant Nivrutti Bhosale v. Mina Hanmant Bhosale The respondent's petition to condone a 14-month 14-day delay in filing an affidavit (kaifiyat) in this property dispute case was partially granted. The court imposed costs of ₹1,000 on the petitioner and condoned the delay, permitting the respondent to file the affidavit after payment. The court found the delay partly justified due to property-related documentation collection requirements, while noting the petitioner's argument that the delay appeared deliberate lacked sufficient substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case