Vidhi Enterprises Tarfe Pro Pra Vishal Mohanrao Bhosale vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 33/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO190003592026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
249/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
Kamti Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vidhi Enterprises Tarfe Pro Pra Vishal Mohanrao Bhosale
Adv. Bhosale Kumar Ashok
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Disposed
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 09-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 33/2026 Summary The court granted Vidhi Enterprises' petition for interim custody of a seized Maruti Suzuki Ertiga CNG vehicle under CrPC Section 503. The petitioner established prima facie ownership through valid documentation and the vehicle was impounded under the Arms Act. The court imposed conditions including a security deposit of ₹10,00,000, requirements to produce the vehicle when summoned, prohibition on color/modification changes, and a photographic inventory by investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 33/2026 Summary The court granted Vidhi Enterprises' petition for interim custody of a seized Maruti Suzuki Ertiga CNG vehicle under CrPC Section 503. The petitioner established prima facie ownership through valid documentation and the vehicle was impounded under the Arms Act. The court imposed conditions including a security deposit of ₹10,00,000, requirements to produce the vehicle when summoned, prohibition on color/modification changes, and a photographic inventory by investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts