Govind Ramchandra Ghagare vs Ravikiran Ravindranath Bhurale — 33/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO190002412024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

24th July 2026

e-Filing Number

01-02-2024

Filing Number

54/2024

Filing Date

01-02-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

03-02-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

3-II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Govind Ramchandra Ghagare

Adv. DESHPANDE AMOL VYANKATESH

Respondent(s)

Ravikiran Ravindranath Bhurale

Prakashchandra Ravindranath Bhurale

Raja Alias Raju Ravindranath Bhurale

Hearing History

Judge: 3-II Jt. Civil Judge J. D. JMFC Mohol

16-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

12-02-2026

Steps

07-01-2026

Hearing

20-12-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

09-05-2024
Order on T.I.
06-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 33/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for police protection under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff sought police protection to enforce a temporary injunction order against agricultural land obstruction by defendants. The court found the application lacked merit due to: (1) a four-month delay between the alleged August 2024 incident and December 2024 application filing; (2) absence of recent obstruction incidents; (3) availability of specific remedies under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the CPC; and (4) insufficient evidence of grave emergency warranting police intervention. The suit regarding final possession remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 33/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for police protection under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff sought police protection to enforce a temporary injunction order against agricultural land obstruction by defendants. The court found the application lacked merit due to: (1) a four-month delay between the alleged August 2024 incident and December 2024 application filing; (2) absence of recent obstruction incidents; (3) availability of specific remedies under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the CPC; and (4) insufficient evidence of grave emergency warranting police intervention. The suit regarding final possession remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case