Vanita Balasao Kharade vs Devidas Bhima Ghadage — 317/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO180025572023

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

07-12-2023

Filing Number

432/2023

Filing Date

08-12-2023

Registration No

317/2023

Registration Date

11-12-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Vanita Balasao Kharade

Adv. GAIKWAD MAHADEO DNYANOBA

Anita Rajendra Chavan

Adv. GAIKWAD MAHADEO DNYANOBA

Sunita Vijay Chavan

Adv. GAIKWAD MAHADEO DNYANOBA

Punam Bandu Kawade

Adv. GAIKWAD MAHADEO DNYANOBA

Laxmi Devidas Ghadage

Adv. GAIKWAD MAHADEO DNYANOBA

Respondent(s)

Devidas Bhima Ghadage

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

07-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

29-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

04-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case 317/2023 Summary In this partition suit involving immovable property, the Joint Civil Judge allowed defendant Devidas Bhima Ghadage's two applications to file his delayed written statement and say despite missing prescribed deadlines. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 in each instance, holding that litigation should be decided on merits rather than technicalities and that the defendant deserved opportunity to present his defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 317/2023 Summary In this partition suit involving immovable property, the Joint Civil Judge allowed defendant Devidas Bhima Ghadage's two applications to file his delayed written statement and say despite missing prescribed deadlines. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 in each instance, holding that litigation should be decided on merits rather than technicalities and that the defendant deserved opportunity to present his defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case