Vishanu Muralidhar Vakade vs Shripad Digambar Mandave — 1035/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO180020802022

Filing Number

1641/2022

Filing Date

18-Nov-2022

Registration No

1035/2022

Registration Date

19-Dec-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishanu Muralidhar Vakade

    Adv. Patil Shivaji Pandurang

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shripad Digambar Mandave

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the complaint filed by Vishanu Muralidhar Vakade against Shripad Digambar Mandave under Section 256 CrPC on 08.05.2026. The Judicial Magistrate found that despite the case being over 3 years old (filed 18.11.2022) and multiple adjournments for dismissal, the complainant and his advocate repeatedly failed to appear before the court, demonstrating lack of interest in actively pursuing the matter. The court reasoned that maintaining the dormant case served no purpose and unnecessarily burdened the judicial system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  4. 04-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  11. 12-Sep-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  12. 29-Jul-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  13. 30-Apr-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  14. 27-Mar-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  15. 31-Dec-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  16. 15-Nov-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  17. 14-Oct-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  18. 03-Sep-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  19. 06-Aug-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  20. 12-Jun-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  21. 01-Mar-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  22. 22-Jan-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  23. 24-Nov-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  24. 27-Sep-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  25. 14-Aug-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  26. 06-Jun-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  27. 09-May-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  28. 12-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  29. 22-Feb-2023

    Verification

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  30. 13-Jan-2023

    Verification

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

  31. 28-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 18-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1035/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the complaint filed by Vishanu Muralidhar Vakade against Shripad Digambar Mandave under Section 256 CrPC on 08.05.2026. The Judicial Magistrate found that despite the case being over 3 years old (filed 18.11.2022) and multiple adjournments for dismissal, the complainant and his advocate repeatedly failed to appear before the court, demonstrating lack of interest in actively pursuing the matter. The court reasoned that maintaining the dormant case served no purpose and unnecessarily burdened the judicial system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case