State of Maharashtra vs Timmaya Gangappa Pullur Advocate - Mali V.R. — 1000/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO180020392023
e-Filing Number
29-08-2023
Filing Number
1708/2023
Filing Date
03-10-2023
Registration No
1000/2023
Registration Date
05-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
473
Police Station
Mangalwedha P.S.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Timmaya Gangappa Pullur Advocate - Mali V.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 30-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 20-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 22-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Timmaya Gangappa Pullur Advocate - Mali V.R. (1000/2023) The court discharged the accused under Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings for an offence under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). The Judicial Magistrate cited the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite ample opportunities, the case's age (over 2 years), and the High Court's directive to dispose of old matters as grounds for terminating the trial as futile and wasteful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Timmaya Gangappa Pullur Advocate - Mali V.R. (1000/2023) The court discharged the accused under Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings for an offence under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). The Judicial Magistrate cited the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite ample opportunities, the case's age (over 2 years), and the High Court's directive to dispose of old matters as grounds for terminating the trial as futile and wasteful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts