Excise Dept. State of Maharashtara vs Hamid Nabisab Inamdar — 892/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO180018892023

Filing Number

1564/2023

Filing Date

21-Sep-2023

Registration No

892/2023

Registration Date

25-Sep-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

1.Excise Dept. State of Maharashtara

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

1.Hamid Nabisab Inamdar

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court discharged accused Hamid Nabisab Inamdar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(c)(d) case by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, citing the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite ample opportunities and the case lingering over 2 years without progress. Seized assets were ordered disposed accordingly after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
11-Dec-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
03-Dec-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
02-Sep-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
22-Apr-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
02-Jan-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
30-Jul-2024

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
02-Mar-2024

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
07-Oct-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
21-Sep-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 892/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Hamid Nabisab Inamdar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(c)(d) case by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, citing the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite ample opportunities and the case lingering over 2 years without progress. Seized assets were ordered disposed accordingly after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.