State of Maharashtra vs Siddheshwar Dhulappa Malge Advocate - Vhangonde Gangadhar Sidhappa — 222/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO180013712025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1103/2025

Filing Date

03-09-2025

Registration No

222/2025

Registration Date

03-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

563

Police Station

Mangalwedha P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Siddheshwar Dhulappa Malge Advocate - Vhangonde Gangadhar Sidhappa

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Arguments

24-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court acquitted defendant Siddheshwar Dhulappa Malge of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 118(1), 115(2), and 352, finding insufficient evidence that he assaulted the complainant with an iron ring or used abusive language. The court noted the complainant's testimony lacked credibility, particularly because the complainant and defendant had settled their dispute, and the single witness provided no corroborating details about the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted defendant Siddheshwar Dhulappa Malge of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 118(1), 115(2), and 352, finding insufficient evidence that he assaulted the complainant with an iron ring or used abusive language. The court noted the complainant's testimony lacked credibility, particularly because the complainant and defendant had settled their dispute, and the single witness provided no corroborating details about the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case