Kavita Narayan Bansode Urf Kavita Shrimant Bhagat Etc 1 vs Tanajai Muralidhar Khadtare etc — 187/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO180012732025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-08-2025

Filing Number

265/2025

Filing Date

21-08-2025

Registration No

187/2025

Registration Date

22-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2
IA/1/2025 Classification : Temporary - Interim Injunction Section Kavita Narayan Bansode Urf Kavita Shrimant Bhagat Etc 1Tanajai Muralidhar Khadtare etc 1

Petitioner(s)

Kavita Narayan Bansode Urf Kavita Shrimant Bhagat Etc 1

Adv. TATE RAMCHANDRA MAHADEO

Lata Narayan Bansode Urf Lata Audumber Gawali

Adv. TATE RAMCHANDRA MAHADEO

Respondent(s)

Tanajai Muralidhar Khadtare etc

Vishnu Narayan Bansode

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

28-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

08-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

04-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

02-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

28-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge in R.C.S. No. 187/2025 allowed Defendant No. 1's application to file a written statement on record, subject to payment of Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff. The court held that denying the defendant's right to defend himself based on delay would be unjust, especially since he claimed illness and unavailable documents prevented timely filing. The written statement will be recorded after the cost amount is deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge in R.C.S. No. 187/2025 allowed Defendant No. 1's application to file a written statement on record, subject to payment of Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff. The court held that denying the defendant's right to defend himself based on delay would be unjust, especially since he claimed illness and unavailable documents prevented timely filing. The written statement will be recorded after the cost amount is deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case