Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar vs Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli etc — 172/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO180012122024
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-08-2024
Filing Number
239/2024
Filing Date
02-08-2024
Registration No
172/2024
Registration Date
02-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar
Adv. Kasabe M. V.
Respondent(s)
Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli etc
Ruksana Ayub Tamboli
Savitribai Balappa Athvale
Uttam Vallappa Athavale
Kantubai Shiva Sakhare
Indubai Bhikan Sakhare
Surekha Manohar Kamble
Krushna Lokappa Tuplonde
Rahul Huwappa Tuplonde
Nanda Pramod Sukar
Sukesh Chandrakant Tupalondhe
Mangal Chandrakant Tuplonde
Bhimashankar Chandrakant Tuplonde
Rupali Santosh Jagdale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha
Steps
Steps
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Steps |
| 13-03-2026 | Steps |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 172/2024 Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar v. Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli & Others The petitioner's interim application for access to a 10-foot-wide road to reach his property was ALLOWED. The court found that the Tahsildar's previous order granting access through respondents' property was illegal and based on a faulty site inspection. The court determined the petitioner has independent possession of his land with no alternative access, while respondents have adequate access through their adjoining property. Consequently, respondents must permit the petitioner road access, and any obstruction will result in damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 172/2024 Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar v. Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli & Others The petitioner's interim application for access to a 10-foot-wide road to reach his property was ALLOWED. The court found that the Tahsildar's previous order granting access through respondents' property was illegal and based on a faulty site inspection. The court determined the petitioner has independent possession of his land with no alternative access, while respondents have adequate access through their adjoining property. Consequently, respondents must permit the petitioner road access, and any obstruction will result in damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts