Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar vs Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli etc — 172/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO180012122024

Steps

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

02-08-2024

Filing Number

239/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

172/2024

Registration Date

02-08-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar

Adv. Kasabe M. V.

Respondent(s)

Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli etc

Ruksana Ayub Tamboli

Savitribai Balappa Athvale

Uttam Vallappa Athavale

Kantubai Shiva Sakhare

Indubai Bhikan Sakhare

Surekha Manohar Kamble

Krushna Lokappa Tuplonde

Rahul Huwappa Tuplonde

Nanda Pramod Sukar

Sukesh Chandrakant Tupalondhe

Mangal Chandrakant Tuplonde

Bhimashankar Chandrakant Tuplonde

Rupali Santosh Jagdale

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

24-04-2026

Steps

13-03-2026

Steps

11-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: 172/2024 Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar v. Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli & Others The petitioner's interim application for access to a 10-foot-wide road to reach his property was ALLOWED. The court found that the Tahsildar's previous order granting access through respondents' property was illegal and based on a faulty site inspection. The court determined the petitioner has independent possession of his land with no alternative access, while respondents have adequate access through their adjoining property. Consequently, respondents must permit the petitioner road access, and any obstruction will result in damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 172/2024 Revanshiddh Annaraya Birajdar v. Paigambar Gaybi Tamboli & Others The petitioner's interim application for access to a 10-foot-wide road to reach his property was ALLOWED. The court found that the Tahsildar's previous order granting access through respondents' property was illegal and based on a faulty site inspection. The court determined the petitioner has independent possession of his land with no alternative access, while respondents have adequate access through their adjoining property. Consequently, respondents must permit the petitioner road access, and any obstruction will result in damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case