State of Maharashtra vs Salim Shekhlal Tanmboli — 590/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO180011732024
e-Filing Number
24-07-2024
Filing Number
960/2024
Filing Date
29-07-2024
Registration No
590/2024
Registration Date
29-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
340
Police Station
Mangalwedha P.S.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Salim Shekhlal Tanmboli
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-03-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-11-2024 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Salim Tamboli (590/2024) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Cr.P.C. after finding the prosecution had failed to produce the Compounding Authority (C.A.) report despite multiple opportunities, rendering the trial futile. The court found the case lingering without progress and ordered stoppage of proceedings, cancellation of bail bonds, and transfer of seized country liquor (8 bottles) to the Excise Department post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Salim Tamboli (590/2024) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Cr.P.C. after finding the prosecution had failed to produce the Compounding Authority (C.A.) report despite multiple opportunities, rendering the trial futile. The court found the case lingering without progress and ordered stoppage of proceedings, cancellation of bail bonds, and transfer of seized country liquor (8 bottles) to the Excise Department post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts