state of maharashtra vs Siddheshwar Babu Lokhande etc.4 Advocate - Mane S. L. — 59/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,452,324,323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO180009592017
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
Filing Number
750/2017
Filing Date
02-08-2017
Registration No
59/2017
Registration Date
02-08-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
FIR Details
FIR Number
206
Police Station
Mangalwedha P.S.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Siddheshwar Babu Lokhande etc.4 Advocate - Mane S. L.
Vijas Siddheshwar Lokhande
Adv. Mane S. L.
Sagar Ganesh Lokhande
Adv. Mane S. L.
Sangita Siddhu @ Siddheshwar Lokhande
Adv. Mane S. L.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Siddheshwar Babu Lokhande (59/2017) The application filed by accused Siddheshwar Babu Lokhande seeking permission to obtain a No Objection Certificate for passport issuance and foreign travel to Dubai was allowed. The court granted permission subject to conditions: applicant must provide 10-day advance notice of travel itinerary, remain available for court proceedings, and file an undertaking allowing his advocate to represent him in his absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Siddheshwar Babu Lokhande (59/2017) The application filed by accused Siddheshwar Babu Lokhande seeking permission to obtain a No Objection Certificate for passport issuance and foreign travel to Dubai was allowed. The court granted permission subject to conditions: applicant must provide 10-day advance notice of travel itinerary, remain available for court proceedings, and file an undertaking allowing his advocate to represent him in his absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts