Hari Dagdu Jain vs Shrirang Prabhakar Kokare Advocate - Lawate S.T. — 148/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO180008162021
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
180/2021
Filing Date
03-09-2021
Registration No
148/2021
Registration Date
07-09-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hari Dagdu Jain
Adv. Pawar Shirish R.
Respondent(s)
Shrirang Prabhakar Kokare Advocate - Lawate S.T.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Issues |
| 13-02-2026 | Issues |
| 19-01-2026 | Issues |
| 12-12-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 148/2021 - Hari Dagdu Jain v. Shrirang Prabhakar Kokare Outcome: The petitioner's application for interim relief was GRANTED. The court approved the petition seeking immediate protection of the petitioner's property rights while ordering that costs shall be determined at the final judgment stage. Key Facts: The dispute concerns agricultural land (Plot 130/1) in Mangalwedha, Solapur. The petitioner alleged that on August 23, 2021, the respondent unlawfully entered the petitioner's land boundary and attempted to dig trenches and erect cement poles using heavy machinery (tractor and JCB), thereby destroying the boundary markers and threatening the petitioner's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 148/2021 - Hari Dagdu Jain v. Shrirang Prabhakar Kokare Outcome: The petitioner's application for interim relief was GRANTED. The court approved the petition seeking immediate protection of the petitioner's property rights while ordering that costs shall be determined at the final judgment stage. Key Facts: The dispute concerns agricultural land (Plot 130/1) in Mangalwedha, Solapur. The petitioner alleged that on August 23, 2021, the respondent unlawfully entered the petitioner's land boundary and attempted to dig trenches and erect cement poles using heavy machinery (tractor and JCB), thereby destroying the boundary markers and threatening the petitioner's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts