Chandrashekhar Patil vs Mahadev Lendave Patil Advocate - Mane D. S. — 1800095/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO180007652015
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1800135/2015
Filing Date
02-07-2015
Registration No
1800095/2015
Registration Date
02-07-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekhar Patil
Adv. Badodkar M.S.
Respondent(s)
Mahadev Lendave Patil Advocate - Mane D. S.
Sulochana Patil
Adv. Mane D. S.
Sushila Patil
Adv. V.R.Karandikar
Ranjit Patil
Adv. V.R.Karandikar
Arvind Patil
Adv. V.R.Karandikar
Bhavanipratap Patil
Adv. Mane D. S.
Tulsi Patil
Adv. Mane D. S.
Sou.Parinita Patil
Adv. Mane D. S.
Kishor Sukhdeo Dattu
Pravin Vijay Khavtode
Sushma Balasaheb Dhanve
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 95/2015 The Civil Judge Jr. Division at Mangalwedha allowed the plaintiff's application to produce the death certificate of defendant no.1 Mahadeo Sidram Lendave-Patil on record. Although filed after the limitation period, the court permitted production as the document was found to be relevant and material with no prejudice to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 95/2015 The Civil Judge Jr. Division at Mangalwedha allowed the plaintiff's application to produce the death certificate of defendant no.1 Mahadeo Sidram Lendave-Patil on record. Although filed after the limitation period, the court permitted production as the document was found to be relevant and material with no prejudice to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts