Bank of Maharashtra Bramhapuri vs Mahantesh Basvant Patil etc — 68/2025
Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 20th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO180003912025
e-Filing Number
03-03-2025
Filing Number
75/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
68/2025
Registration Date
04-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank of Maharashtra Bramhapuri
Adv. JADHAV VISHNU BALIRAM
Respondent(s)
Mahantesh Basvant Patil etc
Vijayakumar Basvant Patil
Basvant Shivappa Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Disposed
Arguments
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 13-02-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Mahantesh Basvant Patil Court Decision: The suit is partly decreed. The court ordered the three defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 3,71,697 (arrears on a Rs. 2,74,000 crop loan sanctioned in 2018) at 7% per annum from suit filing until decree, and 6% thereafter until full realization. Defendants 2 and 3, as guarantors, are equally liable with the primary borrower. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the bank's claimed 16% interest rate as excessive, noting the agreed contractual rate was 7% per annum. Relying on CCI v. Ravindra precedent, it reduced future interest to 6% to meet justice requirements for agricultural loans. Defendants' default and non-response to recovery notices were established despite ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Mahantesh Basvant Patil Court Decision: The suit is partly decreed. The court ordered the three defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 3,71,697 (arrears on a Rs. 2,74,000 crop loan sanctioned in 2018) at 7% per annum from suit filing until decree, and 6% thereafter until full realization. Defendants 2 and 3, as guarantors, are equally liable with the primary borrower. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the bank's claimed 16% interest rate as excessive, noting the agreed contractual rate was 7% per annum. Relying on CCI v. Ravindra precedent, it reduced future interest to 6% to meet justice requirements for agricultural loans. Defendants' default and non-response to recovery notices were established despite ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts