Bank of Maharashtra Bramhapuri vs Mahantesh Basvant Patil etc — 68/2025
Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 20th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO180003912025
e-Filing Number
03-03-2025
Filing Number
75/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
68/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bank of Maharashtra Bramhapuri
Adv. JADHAV VISHNU BALIRAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahantesh Basvant Patil etc
-
2.Vijayakumar Basvant Patil
-
3.Basvant Shivappa Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Mahantesh Basvant Patil Court Decision: The suit is partly decreed. The court ordered the three defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 3,71,697 (arrears on a Rs. 2,74,000 crop loan sanctioned in 2018) at 7% per annum from suit filing until decree, and 6% thereafter until full realization. Defendants 2 and 3, as guarantors, are equally liable with the primary borrower. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the bank's claimed 16% interest rate as excessive, noting the agreed contractual rate was 7% per annum. Relying on CCI v. Ravindra precedent, it reduced future interest to 6% to meet justice requirements for agricultural loans. Defendants' default and non-response to recovery notices were established despite ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
06-Mar-2026
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
23-Feb-2026
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
13-Feb-2026
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
02-Jan-2026
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
15-Dec-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
28-Nov-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
14-Nov-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
04-Nov-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
15-Oct-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
07-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
19-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
25-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
06-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
-
11-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2025
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Mahantesh Basvant Patil Court Decision: The suit is partly decreed. The court ordered the three defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 3,71,697 (arrears on a Rs. 2,74,000 crop loan sanctioned in 2018) at 7% per annum from suit filing until decree, and 6% thereafter until full realization. Defendants 2 and 3, as guarantors, are equally liable with the primary borrower. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the bank's claimed 16% interest rate as excessive, noting the agreed contractual rate was 7% per annum. Relying on CCI v. Ravindra precedent, it reduced future interest to 6% to meet justice requirements for agricultural loans. Defendants' default and non-response to recovery notices were established despite ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts