Rani Sandip Ingale vs Chaya Shivaji Ingale Advocate - MORE SOURABH SUNIL — 44/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO180003312026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rani Sandip Ingale

    Adv. Shirish Rajaram Pawar

  2. 2.Dnyaneshwari Sandip Ingale

    Adv. Shirish Rajaram Pawar

  3. 3.Warad Sandip Ingale

    Adv. Shirish Rajaram Pawar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chaya Shivaji Ingale Advocate - MORE SOURABH SUNIL

  2. 2.Shivaji Vithoba Ingale

  3. 3.Sagar Shivaji Ingale

  4. 4.Manisha Maruti Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Lok-Adalat at Mangalwedha disposed of Case 44/2026 by accepting a compromise settlement between the parties. The court found the compromise deed (Exh.10) to be lawful and voluntary, signed by all parties and their advocates. The suit stands disposed of per the compromise terms, with court fees refunded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. JMFC, Mangalwedha

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalat at Mangalwedha disposed of Case 44/2026 by accepting a compromise settlement between the parties. The court found the compromise deed (Exh.10) to be lawful and voluntary, signed by all parties and their advocates. The suit stands disposed of per the compromise terms, with court fees refunded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case