Arun Dada Nanavare etc 2 vs Waman Balu Nanavare etc 4 Advocate - Deshmukh Vishvas R. — 1800061/2005
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO180000652005
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1800061/2005
Filing Date
16-06-2005
Registration No
1800061/2005
Registration Date
27-06-2005
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mangalwedha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arun Dada Nanavare etc 2
Adv. Lawate S.T.
Respondent(s)
Waman Balu Nanavare etc 4 Advocate - Deshmukh Vishvas R.
Dattatraya Bapu Chougule
Adv. Deshmukh Vishvas R.
Laxman Mahadev Chougle
Adv. Deshmukh Vishvas R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mangalwedha
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 1800061/2005 (R.C.S. No. 61/2005) Outcome: The court allowed the defendants' application and permitted production of documents. The Civil Judge Jr. Division granted permission for the defendants to file a sale deed dated 18.11.1993, 7/12 extract of Gat no. 15/4, and 8A extract, finding these documents relevant and material despite plaintiffs' objection that they were unrelated to the suit and potentially misleading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 1800061/2005 (R.C.S. No. 61/2005) Outcome: The court allowed the defendants' application and permitted production of documents. The Civil Judge Jr. Division granted permission for the defendants to file a sale deed dated 18.11.1993, 7/12 extract of Gat no. 15/4, and 8A extract, finding these documents relevant and material despite plaintiffs' objection that they were unrelated to the suit and potentially misleading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts