The State of Maharashtra vs Sikandar Ramji Pasvan — 1379/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO170034682024

Filing Number

2396/2024

Filing Date

30-Dec-2024

Registration No

1379/2024

Registration Date

30-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

13-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

777

Police Station

Temburni Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sikandar Ramji Pasvan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sikandar Ramji Paswan and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC for an offense under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found that despite issuing summons and warrants, the accused remained absent with no prospect of securing his presence, making it impractical to continue the summons case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  5. 01-Jan-2026

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  6. 26-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  8. 15-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  9. 07-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1379/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sikandar Ramji Paswan and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC for an offense under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found that despite issuing summons and warrants, the accused remained absent with no prospect of securing his presence, making it impractical to continue the summons case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case