The State of Maharashtra vs Akshay Sanjay Shinde — 1770/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO170031732025

Filing Number

2465/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

1770/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

13-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

373

Police Station

Temburni Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akshay Sanjay Shinde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Akshay Sanjay Shinde and closed proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, finding that despite issuance of summons and warrant, the prosecution failed to secure his presence and there was no immediate prospect of doing so. Given the case's age and nature, the court deemed it just to stop proceedings under a special case closure drive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1770/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Akshay Sanjay Shinde and closed proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, finding that despite issuance of summons and warrant, the prosecution failed to secure his presence and there was no immediate prospect of doing so. Given the case's age and nature, the court deemed it just to stop proceedings under a special case closure drive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case