MAHESH INDRAJEET WAGHMODE vs SANTOSH BHARAT WAGHMODE Advocate - Nagare Sandip Chudaram — 908/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170030202024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

30-11-2024

Filing Number

1031/2024

Filing Date

03-12-2024

Registration No

908/2024

Registration Date

06-12-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

4-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Madha

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

MAHESH INDRAJEET WAGHMODE

Adv. Masal Sanjay Dattu

SAVITA INDRAJEET WAGHMODE

Adv. MASAL SANJAY DATTU

Respondent(s)

SANTOSH BHARAT WAGHMODE Advocate - Nagare Sandip Chudaram

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Madha

29-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

24-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

17-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

31-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

13-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

10-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

The plaintiff's application to set aside the order for no written statement regarding the defendants' counter-claim and to submit a written statement beyond the statutory 90-day period was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to file the written statement given the suit's nature involving immovable property rights, but imposed costs of Rs. 300/- payable to the defendants in the counter-claim to compensate for the inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The plaintiff's application to set aside the order for no written statement regarding the defendants' counter-claim and to submit a written statement beyond the statutory 90-day period was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to file the written statement given the suit's nature involving immovable property rights, but imposed costs of Rs. 300/- payable to the defendants in the counter-claim to compensate for the inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case