Bapusaheb Vishinu Jagtap vs Balasaheb Vishinu Jagtap Advocate - Sathe Y. B. — 564/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 14th August 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 14-Aug-2026 in 1 week

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170024942023

Filing Number

636/2023

Filing Date

21-Aug-2023

Registration No

564/2023

Registration Date

23-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

4-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bapusaheb Vishinu Jagtap

    Adv. Ingale S.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balasaheb Vishinu Jagtap Advocate - Sathe Y. B.

  2. 2.Kumar Haridas Jagtap

  3. 3.Chandrakant Limbaji Jagtap

Case History

  1. 14-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In RCS 564/2023, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a suit concerning measurement and fixation of property boundaries. A court commissioner had measured the property on 14/06/2024 and reported that defendants had encroached on the suit property; the plaintiff sought to amend the plaint based on the commissioner's findings. The court found the amendment just and necessary to elucidate the real controversy and granted it, ordering the plaintiff to submit the amended plaint within 14 days while preserving defendants' rights to make consequential amendments and object to the commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  8. 18-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  10. 09-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  12. 12-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  13. 18-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  14. 23-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  15. 07-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  16. 10-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  17. 31-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 31-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  19. 20-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  20. 16-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  21. 21-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  22. 02-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 21-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 564/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In RCS 564/2023, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a suit concerning measurement and fixation of property boundaries. A court commissioner had measured the property on 14/06/2024 and reported that defendants had encroached on the suit property; the plaintiff sought to amend the plaint based on the commissioner's findings. The court found the amendment just and necessary to elucidate the real controversy and granted it, ordering the plaintiff to submit the amended plaint within 14 days while preserving defendants' rights to make consequential amendments and object to the commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case