Bapusaheb Vishinu Jagtap vs Balasaheb Vishinu Jagtap Advocate - Sathe Y. B. — 564/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 14th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO170024942023
Next Hearing
14th August 2026
Filing Number
636/2023
Filing Date
21-08-2023
Registration No
564/2023
Registration Date
23-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Madha
Judge
4-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Madha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bapusaheb Vishinu Jagtap
Adv. Ingale S.V.
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Vishinu Jagtap Advocate - Sathe Y. B.
Kumar Haridas Jagtap
Chandrakant Limbaji Jagtap
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Madha
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 29-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
In RCS 564/2023, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a suit concerning measurement and fixation of property boundaries. A court commissioner had measured the property on 14/06/2024 and reported that defendants had encroached on the suit property; the plaintiff sought to amend the plaint based on the commissioner's findings. The court found the amendment just and necessary to elucidate the real controversy and granted it, ordering the plaintiff to submit the amended plaint within 14 days while preserving defendants' rights to make consequential amendments and object to the commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In RCS 564/2023, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a suit concerning measurement and fixation of property boundaries. A court commissioner had measured the property on 14/06/2024 and reported that defendants had encroached on the suit property; the plaintiff sought to amend the plaint based on the commissioner's findings. The court found the amendment just and necessary to elucidate the real controversy and granted it, ordering the plaintiff to submit the amended plaint within 14 days while preserving defendants' rights to make consequential amendments and object to the commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts