The State of Maharashtra vs Sahil Amir Pathan — 761/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO170022552024

Filing Number

1393/2024

Filing Date

20-Sep-2024

Registration No

761/2024

Registration Date

24-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

13-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

512

Police Station

Temburni Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sahil Amir Pathan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sahil Amir Pathan and terminated proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 offense case. The discharge was granted because despite issuance of summons and warrant, the accused remained absent and there was no immediate prospect of securing his presence, rendering continued prosecution impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  5. 18-Oct-2025

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  6. 21-Jun-2025

    B.W._Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  7. 22-Mar-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  8. 23-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 761/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sahil Amir Pathan and terminated proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 offense case. The discharge was granted because despite issuance of summons and warrant, the accused remained absent and there was no immediate prospect of securing his presence, rendering continued prosecution impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case