Vandana Nagnath Ghule vs Tukaram Viswanath Kale Advocate - Shaikh K.R. — 778/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 09-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170022042024

e-Filing Number

18-09-2024

Filing Number

870/2024

Filing Date

18-Sep-2024

Registration No

778/2024

Registration Date

23-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

12-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vandana Nagnath Ghule

    Adv. Bhosale Shivraj Shridhar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Viswanath Kale Advocate - Shaikh K.R.

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Vandana Nagnath Ghule v. Tukaram Viswanath Kale (RCS 778/2024) The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 5th May 2026. The court found that Vandana established a prima facie case of lawful possession over the disputed 60-acre property in Solapur based on her registered sale deed (dated 13/10/2023) and consistent revenue entries. The defendants were restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  4. 02-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  18. 30-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  20. 02-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  22. 13-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  23. 31-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  24. 21-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  25. 18-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  26. 01-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  27. 19-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  28. 17-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  29. 17-Apr-2025

    Steps_Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  30. 10-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  31. 29-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  32. 17-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  33. 11-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  34. 03-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 18-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 778/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vandana Nagnath Ghule v. Tukaram Viswanath Kale (RCS 778/2024) The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 5th May 2026. The court found that Vandana established a prima facie case of lawful possession over the disputed 60-acre property in Solapur based on her registered sale deed (dated 13/10/2023) and consistent revenue entries. The defendants were restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case