Vandana Nagnath Ghule vs Tukaram Viswanath Kale Advocate - Shaikh K.R. — 778/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170022042024

Issues

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

e-Filing Number

18-09-2024

Filing Number

870/2024

Filing Date

18-09-2024

Registration No

778/2024

Registration Date

23-09-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

12-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Madha

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Section39

Petitioner(s)

Vandana Nagnath Ghule

Adv. Bhosale Shivraj Shridhar

Respondent(s)

Tukaram Viswanath Kale Advocate - Shaikh K.R.

Hearing History

Judge: 12-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Madha

05-05-2026

Issues

02-05-2026

Order on Exh

28-04-2026

Order on Exh

23-04-2026

Order on Exh

07-04-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

05-05-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Vandana Nagnath Ghule v. Tukaram Viswanath Kale (RCS 778/2024) The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 5th May 2026. The court found that Vandana established a prima facie case of lawful possession over the disputed 60-acre property in Solapur based on her registered sale deed (dated 13/10/2023) and consistent revenue entries. The defendants were restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vandana Nagnath Ghule v. Tukaram Viswanath Kale (RCS 778/2024) The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 5th May 2026. The court found that Vandana established a prima facie case of lawful possession over the disputed 60-acre property in Solapur based on her registered sale deed (dated 13/10/2023) and consistent revenue entries. The defendants were restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case