Gorakh Raaghu Vatkar vs Rama Uttam Waghmare Advocate - Sancheti P. M. — 740/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 10-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170020462024

e-Filing Number

19-08-2024

Filing Number

828/2024

Filing Date

23-Aug-2024

Registration No

740/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

4-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gorakh Raaghu Vatkar

    Adv. DESHMUKH SHUBHAM PRADIP

  2. 2.Adrash Jyotiram Vatkar His Legal Guardian Mother Namrata Jyotiram Vatkar

    Adv. DESHMUKH SHUBHAM PRADIP

  3. 3.Kaviraj Jyotiram Vatkar His Legal Guardian Mother Namrata Jyotiram Vatkar

    Adv. DESHMUKH SHUBHAM PRADIP

  4. 4.Aryan Satish Vatkar His Legal Guardian Father Satish Gorakh Vatkar

    Adv. DESHMUKH SHUBHAM PRADIP

  5. 5.Vadant Satish Vatkar His Legal Guardian Father Satish Gorakh Vatkar

    Adv. DESHMUKH SHUBHAM PRADIP

  6. 6.Surekha Gorakh Vatkar Urf Surekha Kumar Khandare

    Adv. DESHMUKH SHUBHAM PRADIP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rama Uttam Waghmare Advocate - Sancheti P. M.

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  7. 01-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  10. 04-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  11. 23-Jan-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 740/2024 Court: Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Madha Date: 23 January 2025 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction REJECTED Key Facts: Plaintiffs own land in Gat Nos. 1038/2/A/1, 1038/2/D, and 1038/2/E. Defendants own adjacent land and seek access via a way through plaintiffs' property. Plaintiffs filed suit 106/2023 seeking permanent injunction to prevent defendants from creating/using this way. Defendants subsequently approached the Mamlatdar (local administrative officer) under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdar Court Act seeking removal of impediments. The Mamlatdar allowed defendants' application on 29 July 2024. Plaintiffs challenged this order and sought temporary injunction to stay the Mamlatdar's decision. Court's Finding: While plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the Mamlatdar lacked jurisdiction (citing Section 26(b) bar), they failed to prove balance of convenience or irreparable injury favored them. Evidence showed the way existed since long, was blocked by plaintiffs, and defendants have no alternative access to their fields. Granting injunction would lock defendants' land and cause them greater harm than plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 23-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  13. 16-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  14. 07-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  15. 02-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  16. 21-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  17. 16-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  18. 07-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  19. 25-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  20. 11-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  21. 18-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  22. 05-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  23. 18-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Madha

  24. 31-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 23-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 740/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 740/2024 Court: Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Madha Date: 23 January 2025 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction REJECTED Key Facts: Plaintiffs own land in Gat Nos. 1038/2/A/1, 1038/2/D, and 1038/2/E. Defendants own adjacent land and seek access via a way through plaintiffs' property. Plaintiffs filed suit 106/2023 seeking permanent injunction to prevent defendants from creating/using this way. Defendants subsequently approached the Mamlatdar (local administrative officer) under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdar Court Act seeking removal of impediments. The Mamlatdar allowed defendants' application on 29 July 2024. Plaintiffs challenged this order and sought temporary injunction to stay the Mamlatdar's decision. Court's Finding: While plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the Mamlatdar lacked jurisdiction (citing Section 26(b) bar), they failed to prove balance of convenience or irreparable injury favored them. Evidence showed the way existed since long, was blocked by plaintiffs, and defendants have no alternative access to their fields. Granting injunction would lock defendants' land and cause them greater harm than plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case