Pratik Bhartesh Samarth vs Konihi Nahi — 41/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th May 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO170011162025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-04-2025

Filing Number

251/2025

Filing Date

07-04-2025

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

07-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

13-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC,Madha

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Pratik Bhartesh Samarth

Adv. JAGTAP SHASHIKANT SITARAM

Payal Bhartesh Samarth

Adv. JAGTAP SHASHIKANT SITARAM

Swati Bhartesh Samarth

Adv. JAGTAP SHASHIKANT SITARAM

Respondent(s)

Konihi Nahi

Hearing History

Judge: 13-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC,Madha

07-05-2026

Disposed

31-03-2026

Steps_Unready

13-03-2026

Steps_Unready

17-02-2026

Steps_Unready

09-02-2026

Steps_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Pratik and Ors. v. Nil (Civil M.A. No. 41/2025) The court partly allowed the applicants' application for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. The applicants, as legal heirs (wife and two children) of deceased Bharatesh Ramesh Samarth, sought to claim Rs. 35,986/- from his SBI bank account and mutate their names on his immovable property (a flat). The court issued a succession certificate for the bank amount but rejected the claim for the immovable property, directing the applicants to file a separate application under the Bombay Regulation Act for heirship certificate, as movable and immovable property claims fall under different legislative frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pratik and Ors. v. Nil (Civil M.A. No. 41/2025) The court partly allowed the applicants' application for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. The applicants, as legal heirs (wife and two children) of deceased Bharatesh Ramesh Samarth, sought to claim Rs. 35,986/- from his SBI bank account and mutate their names on his immovable property (a flat). The court issued a succession certificate for the bank amount but rejected the claim for the immovable property, directing the applicants to file a separate application under the Bombay Regulation Act for heirship certificate, as movable and immovable property claims fall under different legislative frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case