Pratik Bhartesh Samarth vs Konihi Nahi — 41/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO170011162025
e-Filing Number
07-04-2025
Filing Number
251/2025
Filing Date
07-Apr-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
07-Apr-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Madha
Judge
13-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pratik Bhartesh Samarth
Adv. JAGTAP SHASHIKANT SITARAM
-
2.Payal Bhartesh Samarth
Adv. JAGTAP SHASHIKANT SITARAM
-
3.Swati Bhartesh Samarth
Adv. JAGTAP SHASHIKANT SITARAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Konihi Nahi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Pratik and Ors. v. Nil (Civil M.A. No. 41/2025) The court partly allowed the applicants' application for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. The applicants, as legal heirs (wife and two children) of deceased Bharatesh Ramesh Samarth, sought to claim Rs. 35,986/- from his SBI bank account and mutate their names on his immovable property (a flat). The court issued a succession certificate for the bank amount but rejected the claim for the immovable property, directing the applicants to file a separate application under the Bombay Regulation Act for heirship certificate, as movable and immovable property claims fall under different legislative frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
31-Mar-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
13-Mar-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
17-Feb-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
09-Feb-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
27-Jan-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
19-Jan-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
12-Jan-2026
Steps_Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
09-Dec-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
27-Oct-2025
Steps
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
15-Oct-2025
Steps
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
09-Oct-2025
Steps
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
29-Sep-2025
Steps
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
22-Sep-2025
Steps
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
18-Sep-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
16-Sep-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
09-Sep-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
03-Sep-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
30-Jul-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
11-Jul-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
05-Jul-2025
Proclomation
4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
18-Jun-2025
Proclomation
4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
15-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2025
Case Summary: Pratik and Ors. v. Nil (Civil M.A. No. 41/2025) The court partly allowed the applicants' application for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. The applicants, as legal heirs (wife and two children) of deceased Bharatesh Ramesh Samarth, sought to claim Rs. 35,986/- from his SBI bank account and mutate their names on his immovable property (a flat). The court issued a succession certificate for the bank amount but rejected the claim for the immovable property, directing the applicants to file a separate application under the Bombay Regulation Act for heirship certificate, as movable and immovable property claims fall under different legislative frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts