Ganesh Uttam Sathe vs Uttam Sahebrao Sathe — 67/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 11th May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO170008382025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-03-2025

Filing Number

675/2025

Filing Date

17-03-2025

Registration No

67/2025

Registration Date

17-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

13-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC,Madha

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 156(3)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 419,420,465,467,468,471,199,200,34
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),336(2),336(3),338,340(2),236,237,3(5),61(2)
The Indian Registration Act, 1908 Section 82

Petitioner(s)

Ganesh Uttam Sathe

Adv. Yogesh Bapurao Sathe

Respondent(s)

Uttam Sahebrao Sathe

Hearing History

Judge: 13-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC,Madha

11-05-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

30-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 67/2025 - Ganesh Uttam Sathe v. Uttam Sahebrao Sathe The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to register a criminal case against eight accused parties for alleged cheating and forgery involving an agricultural property gift deed. The petitioner, claiming to be the biological son of Accused No. 1, alleged that his father fraudulently gifted ancestral property to Accused No. 2 (using a similar name) by forging identity documents, and that subsequent sales deprived him of his rightful share. The court found the gift deed legally executed and subsequent sales prima facie valid, noting that Accused No. 2 is the considered son (not biological son) to whom the father voluntarily gifted his partition-received property. The dispute was characterized as civil in nature—involving property rights rather than criminal fraud—and the court directed the petitioner to pursue an appropriate civil suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 67/2025 - Ganesh Uttam Sathe v. Uttam Sahebrao Sathe The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to register a criminal case against eight accused parties for alleged cheating and forgery involving an agricultural property gift deed. The petitioner, claiming to be the biological son of Accused No. 1, alleged that his father fraudulently gifted ancestral property to Accused No. 2 (using a similar name) by forging identity documents, and that subsequent sales deprived him of his rightful share. The court found the gift deed legally executed and subsequent sales prima facie valid, noting that Accused No. 2 is the considered son (not biological son) to whom the father voluntarily gifted his partition-received property. The dispute was characterized as civil in nature—involving property rights rather than criminal fraud—and the court directed the petitioner to pursue an appropriate civil suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case