Ganesh Uttam Sathe vs Uttam Sahebrao Sathe — 67/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 11th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO170008382025
e-Filing Number
10-03-2025
Filing Number
675/2025
Filing Date
17-Mar-2025
Registration No
67/2025
Registration Date
17-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Madha
Judge
13-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ganesh Uttam Sathe
Adv. Yogesh Bapurao Sathe
Respondent(s)
-
1.Uttam Sahebrao Sathe
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 67/2025 - Ganesh Uttam Sathe v. Uttam Sahebrao Sathe The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to register a criminal case against eight accused parties for alleged cheating and forgery involving an agricultural property gift deed. The petitioner, claiming to be the biological son of Accused No. 1, alleged that his father fraudulently gifted ancestral property to Accused No. 2 (using a similar name) by forging identity documents, and that subsequent sales deprived him of his rightful share. The court found the gift deed legally executed and subsequent sales prima facie valid, noting that Accused No. 2 is the considered son (not biological son) to whom the father voluntarily gifted his partition-received property. The dispute was characterized as civil in nature—involving property rights rather than criminal fraud—and the court directed the petitioner to pursue an appropriate civil suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
27-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
15-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
08-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
30-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
07-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
04-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
23-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
17-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
09-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
02-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
01-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
31-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
15-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
06-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
15-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
18-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
01-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
28-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
23-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha
-
25-Apr-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha
-
28-Mar-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha
-
21-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2025
Case Summary: 67/2025 - Ganesh Uttam Sathe v. Uttam Sahebrao Sathe The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to register a criminal case against eight accused parties for alleged cheating and forgery involving an agricultural property gift deed. The petitioner, claiming to be the biological son of Accused No. 1, alleged that his father fraudulently gifted ancestral property to Accused No. 2 (using a similar name) by forging identity documents, and that subsequent sales deprived him of his rightful share. The court found the gift deed legally executed and subsequent sales prima facie valid, noting that Accused No. 2 is the considered son (not biological son) to whom the father voluntarily gifted his partition-received property. The dispute was characterized as civil in nature—involving property rights rather than criminal fraud—and the court directed the petitioner to pursue an appropriate civil suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts