DIPAK MACHHINDRA GONDGIRE vs MACHHINDRA DAMODAR GONDGIRE — 107/2026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170008032026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

12-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPAK MACHHINDRA GONDGIRE

    Adv. LONDHE DNYANESHWAR RAMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MACHHINDRA DAMODAR GONDGIRE

  2. 2.SANGITA MACHHINDRA GONGIRE

  3. 3.PALLAVI RAMA BHUSARE

  4. 4.PRIYANKA DHANAJI SURVASE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 107/2026 - Dipak v. Machindra The court disposed of the suit as compromised after both parties reached a settlement before the Lok-Adalat. The parties admitted the compromise deed and award (Exhibits 10 & 11) as true and correct, along with their signatures, and confirmed they did not wish to continue the litigation. A compromise decree was ordered to be drawn up per the settlement terms, with court fees refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 107/2026 - Dipak v. Machindra The court disposed of the suit as compromised after both parties reached a settlement before the Lok-Adalat. The parties admitted the compromise deed and award (Exhibits 10 & 11) as true and correct, along with their signatures, and confirmed they did not wish to continue the litigation. A compromise decree was ordered to be drawn up per the settlement terms, with court fees refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case