Navnath Vitthal Bhanvase vs Ravi Raju Bhanvase Advocate - Gaikwad Krishna Kailas — 131/2023
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO170005942023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2023
Filing Number
153/2023
Filing Date
24-02-2023
Registration No
131/2023
Registration Date
24-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Madha
Judge
12-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Madha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Navnath Vitthal Bhanvase
Adv. Parbat Mukesh A.
Respondent(s)
Ravi Raju Bhanvase Advocate - Gaikwad Krishna Kailas
Hearing History
Judge: 12-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Madha
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 01-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 131/2023 - Navnath v. Ravi Raju Bhanvase Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED (08 December 2023). The court restrained defendant Ravi from alienating disputed ancestral and joint family properties (agricultural land in Solapur district) through sale, mortgage, gift, or other means, pending final resolution of the partition suit. The court found a prima facie case that plaintiff had raised substantial questions regarding co-ownership rights requiring protection of the property's status during litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 131/2023 - Navnath v. Ravi Raju Bhanvase Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED (08 December 2023). The court restrained defendant Ravi from alienating disputed ancestral and joint family properties (agricultural land in Solapur district) through sale, mortgage, gift, or other means, pending final resolution of the partition suit. The court found a prima facie case that plaintiff had raised substantial questions regarding co-ownership rights requiring protection of the property's status during litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts