Sunanda Das Vasekar vs Tukaram Dharmu Dhage — 48/2022

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Supply of Copies. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Supply of Copies Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO170001462022

Filing Number

61/2022

Filing Date

13-Jan-2022

Registration No

48/2022

Registration Date

13-Jan-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Madha

Judge

12-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunanda Das Vasekar

    Adv. Chavan Sachin Arun

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Dharmu Dhage

  2. 2.Mirabai Tukaram Dhage

  3. 3.Dilip Tukaram Dhage

  4. 4.Rohini Sunil Boravake

  5. 5.Sushila Mahadev Petkar

  6. 6.Kusum Ram Kale

  7. 7.Akash Dilip Dhage

  8. 8.Samadhan Dilip Dhage

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Supply of Copies

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  3. 27-Jan-2026

    Supply of Copies

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  4. 05-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  6. 26-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  8. 04-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  9. 29-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  10. 24-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  11. 06-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  12. 16-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  13. 01-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In this partition, declaration, and perpetual injunction suit, the court allowed defendants 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8's application to condone a 103-day delay in filing their written statement and say. The court found that despite the delay, granting the defendants fair opportunity to present their case was necessary for complete adjudication. The delay was condoned subject to the defendants paying Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiff by the next date, after which their written statement would be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 01-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  15. 24-Sep-2024

    Order

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  16. 30-Aug-2024

    Order

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  17. 12-Jul-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  18. 29-Jun-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  19. 13-Jun-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  20. 19-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  21. 30-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  22. 27-Dec-2023

    Notice_Unready

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  23. 25-Oct-2023

    Notice_Unready

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  24. 02-Sep-2023

    Notice_Unready

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  25. 08-Jun-2023

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  26. 18-Mar-2023

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  27. 09-Feb-2023

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  28. 14-Dec-2022

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  29. 04-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  30. 03-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC,Madha

  31. 15-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  32. 10-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  33. 07-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  34. 23-Feb-2022

    First Order

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Madha

  35. 18-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 13-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this partition, declaration, and perpetual injunction suit, the court allowed defendants 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8's application to condone a 103-day delay in filing their written statement and say. The court found that despite the delay, granting the defendants fair opportunity to present their case was necessary for complete adjudication. The delay was condoned subject to the defendants paying Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiff by the next date, after which their written statement would be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case