Shital Santosh Pol etc 2 vs Yogita Santosh lunkad etc 13 Advocate - Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath — 403/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO160018062025

e-Filing Number

05-12-2025

Filing Number

526/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

403/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala

Judge

2-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shital Santosh Pol etc 2

    Adv. Hirade B. T.

  2. 2.Sandip Dhanaraj Pol

  3. 3.Surekha Arvind Pol

    Adv. HIRDE SACHIN BABURAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yogita Santosh lunkad etc 13 Advocate - Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

  2. 2.Hanumant Nanasaheb Kalel

    Adv. Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

  3. 3.Hanumant Gangaram Karche

  4. 4.Vilas Laxman Deshmukh

    Adv. Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

  5. 5.Sharda Vilas Deshmukh

  6. 6.Vijay Arun Patil

    Adv. Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

  7. 7.Sandip Arun Patil

    Adv. Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

  8. 8.Anna Balkrushna Londhe

  9. 9.Dinakar Bala Pol

  10. 10.Satyabhama Ananta Pol

  11. 11.Paulasti Ekanath Pol

  12. 12.Bansi Vitthal Pol

  13. 13.Suresh Vitthal Pol

  14. 14.Navanath Jagannath Pol

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 403/2025 The Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karmala granted the plaintiff's petition on 12/02/2026 to delete defendant no.14 from the plaint. The plaintiff established that defendant no.14 had died before the Covid-19 pandemic and discovered this fact after the bailiff's summons report; the plaintiff further demonstrated that no legal heirs of the deceased defendant existed. The court accordingly ordered the deletion of defendant no.14's name from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  11. 31-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 18-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  17. 06-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 06-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 06-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 06-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  21. 05-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 05-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 403/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 403/2025 The Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karmala granted the plaintiff's petition on 12/02/2026 to delete defendant no.14 from the plaint. The plaintiff established that defendant no.14 had died before the Covid-19 pandemic and discovered this fact after the bailiff's summons report; the plaintiff further demonstrated that no legal heirs of the deceased defendant existed. The court accordingly ordered the deletion of defendant no.14's name from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case