The State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Bhikaji Takale and 02 Advocate - Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath — 191/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO160011932017

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

859/2017

Filing Date

11-10-2017

Registration No

191/2017

Registration Date

11-10-2017

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-2 nd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KARMALA

FIR Details

FIR Number

445

Police Station

Karmala Police Station

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,34
Environment (Protection) Act Section 9,15

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Sagar Bhikaji Takale and 02 Advocate - Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

Dattatray Hanumant Chormale

Adv. Veer Kamalakar Vishwanath

Bharat Pandurang Markad

Adv. Pathan A. H.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2 nd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KARMALA

22-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

22-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-01-2026

N.B.W._Unready

06-10-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

04-01-2018
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCC No. 191/2017 - State vs. Sagar Bhikaji Takale & Ors. The court allowed the applicants' petition seeking return of seized properties under Section 451 CrPC. A Mahindra tractor and Vinay Industries trolley, allegedly used for unauthorized sand transportation, were seized during investigation. Since the investigation concluded and applicants were charge-sheeted, the court found no grounds to presume they would misuse the vehicles if returned. The applicants were directed to execute indemnity bonds (Rs. 7 lakh and Rs. 2 lakh respectively), maintain vehicle specifications unchanged, produce vehicles on demand, and allow investigation officer photographs prior to release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCC No. 191/2017 - State vs. Sagar Bhikaji Takale & Ors. The court allowed the applicants' petition seeking return of seized properties under Section 451 CrPC. A Mahindra tractor and Vinay Industries trolley, allegedly used for unauthorized sand transportation, were seized during investigation. Since the investigation concluded and applicants were charge-sheeted, the court found no grounds to presume they would misuse the vehicles if returned. The applicants were directed to execute indemnity bonds (Rs. 7 lakh and Rs. 2 lakh respectively), maintain vehicle specifications unchanged, produce vehicles on demand, and allow investigation officer photographs prior to release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case