The State of Maharashtra vs Amol Ramdas Chitalkar — 194/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO160004572026

Filing Number

372/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

194/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-2 nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

Karmala Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amol Ramdas Chitalkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amol Ramdas Chitalkar (194/2026) The First Class Magistrate Court in Karmaala convicted Amol Ramdas Chitalkar under IPC Section 285 for keeping a hand cart in a dangerous condition on a public road in Karmaala on 06.03.2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹300 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default), considering his family responsibilities and economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2 nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amol Ramdas Chitalkar (194/2026) The First Class Magistrate Court in Karmaala convicted Amol Ramdas Chitalkar under IPC Section 285 for keeping a hand cart in a dangerous condition on a public road in Karmaala on 06.03.2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹300 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default), considering his family responsibilities and economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case