The State of Maharashtra vs Samadhan Ranjit Gole — 190/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO160004532026

Filing Number

368/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

190/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-2 nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

Karmala Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Samadhan Ranjit Gole

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Samadhan Ranjit Gole (190/2026) The First Class Magistrate Court, Karmaala found the accused guilty of placing a hand-cart in a dangerous condition on a public road on 09.03.2026, violating Indian Penal Code Section 285. The accused confessed to the charge, and the court convicted him while considering his plea for leniency, given his role as the sole earning member of his household. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 (or two days simple imprisonment if unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2 nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Karmala

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 190/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Samadhan Ranjit Gole (190/2026) The First Class Magistrate Court, Karmaala found the accused guilty of placing a hand-cart in a dangerous condition on a public road on 09.03.2026, violating Indian Penal Code Section 285. The accused confessed to the charge, and the court convicted him while considering his plea for leniency, given his role as the sole earning member of his household. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 (or two days simple imprisonment if unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case