The State of Maharashtra vs Amol Ankush Kalsait — 127/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO160002682025
Filing Number
219/2025
Filing Date
03-02-2025
Registration No
127/2025
Registration Date
04-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala
Judge
2-JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KARMALA
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
717
Police Station
Karmala Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Amol Ankush Kalsait
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KARMALA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 22-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amol Ankush Kalsait (127/2025) The Judicial Magistrate stopped the prosecution under Section 258 CrPC/Section 281 BNSS, 2023, and acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65(E) Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite ample opportunities, the investigating officer failed to produce the critical chemical analyzer report on seized samples, making prosecution impossible. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC if evidence becomes available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amol Ankush Kalsait (127/2025) The Judicial Magistrate stopped the prosecution under Section 258 CrPC/Section 281 BNSS, 2023, and acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65(E) Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite ample opportunities, the investigating officer failed to produce the critical chemical analyzer report on seized samples, making prosecution impossible. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC if evidence becomes available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts