Vishwanath Sopan Mhetre vs Bhairavnath Sopan Mhetre etc 3 Advocate - Waghmode B.S. — 17/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO160000872025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
13-01-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
13-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karmala
Judge
2-JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KARMALA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishwanath Sopan Mhetre
Adv. Rokade S. A.
Respondent(s)
Bhairavnath Sopan Mhetre etc 3 Advocate - Waghmode B.S.
Rukmani Ramesh Shinde
Bai Vaman kapare
Adv. Waghmode B.S.
GopikaBai Prakash Alabate
Adv. Waghmode B.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KARMALA
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 15-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No.17/2025 - Vishwanath vs. Bhairavnath & Others The court allowed defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order passed against them. Finding the defendants' reasons satisfactory (agricultural and household work prevented them from providing information to counsel), the court condoned the 6-month 8-day delay. Defendants were directed to pay Rs. 500 jointly as cost to the plaintiff, after which their written statement will be accepted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No.17/2025 - Vishwanath vs. Bhairavnath & Others The court allowed defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order passed against them. Finding the defendants' reasons satisfactory (agricultural and household work prevented them from providing information to counsel), the court condoned the 6-month 8-day delay. Defendants were directed to pay Rs. 500 jointly as cost to the plaintiff, after which their written statement will be accepted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts