The State of Maharashtra vs Shivappa Laxman Goudgaon — 1254/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150022322024
Filing Number
1889/2024
Filing Date
23-12-2024
Registration No
1254/2024
Registration Date
23-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
559
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Shivappa Laxman Goudgaon
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 26-02-2026 | Unready Board |
| 15-11-2025 | Unready Board |
| 14-08-2025 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Shivappa Laxman Goudgaon (1254/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against the accused for alleged illicit liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing abuse of process. Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet filing on 20.12.2024, the accused remained absent, and the prosecution failed to secure his presence for over a year. The court ordered the case disposed under Section 258 of CrPC, cancelled the accused's PR bonds, and directed disposal of the seized 10-liter illicit liquor according to law after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Shivappa Laxman Goudgaon (1254/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against the accused for alleged illicit liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing abuse of process. Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet filing on 20.12.2024, the accused remained absent, and the prosecution failed to secure his presence for over a year. The court ordered the case disposed under Section 258 of CrPC, cancelled the accused's PR bonds, and directed disposal of the seized 10-liter illicit liquor according to law after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts