The State of Maharashtra vs Subhash Teju Rathod — 1236/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150022082024

Filing Number

1870/2024

Filing Date

19-Dec-2024

Registration No

1236/2024

Registration Date

19-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

496

Police Station

Valsang Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subhash Teju Rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed proceedings against Subhash Teju Rathod under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of Cr.P.C., after the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons and warrants over two years. The court found continued pendency would constitute abuse of process and ordered seizure disposal per law after expiry of the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

  7. 27-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

  8. 23-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

  9. 14-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1236/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed proceedings against Subhash Teju Rathod under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of Cr.P.C., after the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons and warrants over two years. The court found continued pendency would constitute abuse of process and ordered seizure disposal per law after expiry of the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case