The State of Maharashtra vs Vitthal Bhima Pawar — 1226/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150021982024
Filing Number
1860/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
1226/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
479
Police Station
North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Vitthal Bhima Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 21-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 22-08-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Vitthal Bhima Pawar (1226/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against accused Vitthal Pawar for illicit liquor possession under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e), invoking Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS), due to the case being pending over one year with prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons. The court found continuing the case would constitute abuse of process and accordingly cancelled the accused's P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized illicit liquor after appeal period expiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Vitthal Bhima Pawar (1226/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against accused Vitthal Pawar for illicit liquor possession under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e), invoking Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS), due to the case being pending over one year with prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons. The court found continuing the case would constitute abuse of process and accordingly cancelled the accused's P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized illicit liquor after appeal period expiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts