The State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Ganpati Narayankar — 1222/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150021942024
Filing Number
1856/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
1222/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
398
Police Station
North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Santosh Ganpati Narayankar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 31-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Santosh Ganpati Narayankar (1222/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Santosh Narayankar for illegal liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that repeated summons failed to secure his presence over more than one year. The court invoked Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS) to stop proceedings, deeming continued adjournment an abuse of process. The accused's recognizance bonds were cancelled, and 19 confiscated liquor bottles are to be disposed of per law after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Santosh Ganpati Narayankar (1222/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Santosh Narayankar for illegal liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that repeated summons failed to secure his presence over more than one year. The court invoked Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS) to stop proceedings, deeming continued adjournment an abuse of process. The accused's recognizance bonds were cancelled, and 19 confiscated liquor bottles are to be disposed of per law after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts