The State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Ganpati Narayankar — 1222/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150021942024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1856/2024

Filing Date

19-12-2024

Registration No

1222/2024

Registration Date

19-12-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

398

Police Station

North Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Santosh Ganpati Narayankar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

07-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Order on Exh

04-02-2026

Order on Exh

29-10-2025

Appearance

31-07-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State v. Santosh Ganpati Narayankar (1222/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Santosh Narayankar for illegal liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that repeated summons failed to secure his presence over more than one year. The court invoked Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS) to stop proceedings, deeming continued adjournment an abuse of process. The accused's recognizance bonds were cancelled, and 19 confiscated liquor bottles are to be disposed of per law after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Santosh Ganpati Narayankar (1222/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Santosh Narayankar for illegal liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that repeated summons failed to secure his presence over more than one year. The court invoked Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS) to stop proceedings, deeming continued adjournment an abuse of process. The accused's recognizance bonds were cancelled, and 19 confiscated liquor bottles are to be disposed of per law after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case