The State of Maharashtra vs Rasul Saipan Shaikh — 1152/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150021172024

Filing Number

1781/2024

Filing Date

12-Dec-2024

Registration No

1152/2024

Registration Date

12-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

299

Police Station

Excise

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rasul Saipan Shaikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the excise violation case against Rasul Saipan Shaikh under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.). The Judicial Magistrate found that despite multiple summons over more than one year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, and crucially, police destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), making continued proceedings an abuse of process. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled upon disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Unready Board

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  7. 18-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  8. 20-May-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  9. 17-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1152/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the excise violation case against Rasul Saipan Shaikh under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.). The Judicial Magistrate found that despite multiple summons over more than one year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, and crucially, police destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), making continued proceedings an abuse of process. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled upon disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case