The State of Maharashtra vs Dattatray Chandrakant Koli — 1135/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150021002024
Filing Number
1764/2024
Filing Date
12-12-2024
Registration No
1135/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
470
Police Station
North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Dattatray Chandrakant Koli
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 27-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 22-08-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dattatray Chandrakant Koli (1135/2024) The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akkalkot, dismissed proceedings against Dattatray Koli for an alleged offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illicit liquor possession) because the accused remained absent despite multiple summons over more than one year, and the prosecution failed to secure his presence. The court found that continuing to keep the case pending would constitute an abuse of process of law. Accordingly, the proceedings were stopped under Section 258 of the CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS), the accused's bail bonds were cancelled, and the seized 10-liter illicit liquor was ordered to be disposed of according to law after the appeal period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dattatray Chandrakant Koli (1135/2024) The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akkalkot, dismissed proceedings against Dattatray Koli for an alleged offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illicit liquor possession) because the accused remained absent despite multiple summons over more than one year, and the prosecution failed to secure his presence. The court found that continuing to keep the case pending would constitute an abuse of process of law. Accordingly, the proceedings were stopped under Section 258 of the CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS), the accused's bail bonds were cancelled, and the seized 10-liter illicit liquor was ordered to be disposed of according to law after the appeal period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts